Part | Section |
---|---|
1 | (Articles:1,2) THE UNION AND ITS TERRITORY |
2 | (Art 5-11) CITIZENSHIP |
3 | (Art 12-35) FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS |
4, 4A | 4: (Art 36-51) DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY 4A: (Art 51A) FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES |
5 |
THE UNION. |
6 |
THE STATES (152) Chapter 1. GENERAL Chapter 2. THE EXECUTIVE: (153-162)The Governor, (163,164)Council of Ministers, (165)The Advocate General for the State, (166-167)Conduct of Government Business Chapter 3. THE STATE LEGISLATURE: (168-177)General, (178-187)Officers of the State Legislature, (188, 189)Conduct of Business, (190-193)Disqualifications of Members (213) Chapter 4. LEGISLATIVE POWER OF THE GOVERNOR (214-232) CHAPTER 5. THE HIGH COURTS IN THE STATES (233-237) CHAPTER 6. SUBORDINATE COURTS |
7 | THE STATES IN PART B OF THE FIRST SCHEDULE(—Omitted) |
8 | (239-242) THE UNION TERRITORIES |
9 | (243A-243O) Part-9 THE PANCHAYATS (243P-243ZG) Part-9A THE MUNICIPALITIES (243ZH-243ZT) Part-9B THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES |
10 | (244, 244A) THE SCHEDULED AND TRIBAL AREAS |
11 | RELATIONS BETWEEN THE UNION AND THE STATES (Art 245-255) Chapter 1. Legislative Relations (Art 256-263) Chapter 2. Administrative Relations |
12 | FINANCE, PROPERTY, CONTRACTS AND SUITS (Art 264-291) Chapter 1. Finance (Art 292,293) Chapter 2. Borrowing (Art 294-300) Chapter 3. PROPERTY, CONTRACTS, RIGHTS, LIABILITIES, OBLIGATIONS AND SUITS (Art 300A) Chapter 4. RIGHT TO PROPERTY |
Federation | Union | |
---|---|---|
What | Self-governing regions are united under a federal government | Supremacy of the common government is recognized by states |
Fundamental Rights | Ordinary Legal Rights | |
---|---|---|
Can be changed | Protected by the constitution and are not easily changed. Are protected against invasion by the executive, legislature, and judiciary | Protected by ordinary law and can be changed or taken away by the legislature |
Legal Standing | Higher | Lower wrt FR |
fundamental Rights | DPSP | |
Nature | negative or prohibitive | Affirmative |
Enforceable | yes | No. Person cannot walk to court to get DPSP |
Target | For citizens | For government |
Money Bill | Financial Bill | |
---|---|---|
What | Contains matters of money | Apart from Money, other matters can be added |
Originate in | Lok Sabha(with recommendation from President) | Lok Sabha(with recommendation from President) |
Rejection | Cannot by Rajya Sabha | Can be rejected by rajya sabha |
Union List | State List | Concurrent List | |
---|---|---|---|
What | All subjects of national importance are mentioned here. Total 97 subjects | Subjects of local order. Total 66 subjects | Both union and state can make laws. Has 47 subjects. |
Examples | defence, foriegn affairs, banking | Public Order, Police, local govt, public health, sanitation, argiculture, forest, education |
Tax | Fee | |
Tax cannot be collected without authority of law | Fee can be collected | |
Compulsory | Yes. Taken from public for pulbic purpose. | No. This is payment of services provided |
Usage | For any purpose | none |
quid pro quo(something for something) | No | Yes. quid pro quo is essential element |
Public interest litigator | Case |
---|---|
Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar | 1st reported PIL in India about Poor conditions of prisoners and undertrial prisoners. It established the right to speedy justice as a fundamental right |
Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan | Defined guidelines defined sexual harassment, provided strategies to prevent it, and provided information on how to file complaints |
M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India |
1985. Oleum Gas Leak at Shriram Food and Fertiliser Industries, Delhi Case involved an Advocate's death and injuries to others. Highlighted issues of industry safety regulations in densely populated areas Mehta filed PIL in supreme court to prevent plant from reopening and compensation to victims. SC established the principle of absolute liability in this case, meaning the industry would be held liable for the harm caused 1996. Pollution of Ganga(Particularly in Kanpur UP): The court ruled that the right to live in a pollution-free environment was part of Article 21 1996. Taj Trapazium Case: Triangular area(having industries) surrounding the Taj Mahal, which was damaging the monument SC ordered closure/relocation of polluting industries. 1998. Delhi Vehicular Pollution Case Case regarding air pollution caused by vehicular emissions in Delhi, seeking court orders to address the issue 2006, Hazardous Wastes Management Case Case related to the proper management of hazardous wastes |
Parmanand Katara vs. Union of India | Provide immediate medical aid to road accident victims |
Javed vs. State of Haryana | Disqualified people with more than two children from holding certain panchayat offices |
S.P. Gupta vs. Union of India | Any member of the public or social action group can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Courts or the SC to seek remedies for violations of legal or constitutional rights |