Jurist | Definition |
---|---|
Anson | Tells situations when promise should be legally binding |
Sir Frederick Pollock | Constant effort to deliver faith in mutual dealing of men |
Year | Law |
---|---|
Ancient India: Hindu Law(Code of Manusmiriti=Dharmshatra) | Contract based on adherence to Truth & religious notions. It’s person’s duty to pay debt if he does not he will go to horrid hell |
Muslim Period | Contract is called Aqd |
1872 | Britishers introduced Indian Contract Act,English Common Law,Statue Law(introduced in Calcutta, Madras, Bombay). But still Hindu, Mohmadean laws were referred |
Contract of Indemnity | Contract of Guarantee | |
What | Contractual obligation to compensate for loss | Promise to perform another party's promise |
Number of parties | 2 | 3 |
Purpose | used to compensate for a loss | protects the creditor |
Sale | Aggrement to sell | |
---|---|---|
What | Transfers ownership of the goods immediately to the buyer | Only establishes the intent to transfer ownership in the future |
Owner | buyer becomes the legal owner of the goods after paying the price. | Ownership is not transferred until certain conditions are met or a future date is reached |
Example | Sale will happen when construction is complete and the remaining amount is paid | Pay a token amount to purchase an under-construction flat |
sequenceDiagram box Harvey vs Facey(1893) AC 552 participant p as plantiff participant d as defendent participant c as Court end p ->> d: Telegram. Will you sell Bumper Hall pen(Plot of land) d -->> p: Price=900 Euro p ->> d: I will buy d -->> p: Not selling d ->> c: I want land c -->> d: Not provided note over c: Answer to question is not:
Offer
Acceptance
Aggrement | Contract | |
---|---|---|
Legally Binding | no | yes |
Enforcable | no | yes |
Elements | Offer, Acceptance | Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Intention (OACI) |
sequenceDiagram participant d as Dharmodas Ghose participant b as Bramho Dutt participant k as Kedar Nath(Attorney of Brahmo dutt) participant m as Mother of Dharmodas Ghose participant c as Court b ->> d: 20/July 1895
20000/- given
interest of 12%/annum
for house k ->> d: Sign declaration
Age of Dharmodas Ghose
is 21 years. 1 month d -->> k: signed m ->> k: 15/july 1895
Dharmodas Ghose is minor
(ie Age<21) since
I am his legal gurdian m ->> c: 10/sept 1895
Filed suit
Dharmodas Ghose was minor
Hence pending mortgage is void note over c: Decision of court
Contract with minor is
void ab-inito(void from beginning)
Meaning | |
---|---|
Doctrine of Caveat Emptor (sem-2) |
Caveat(Warning), Emptor(buyer or purchaser). Latin phrase that means "let the buyer beware". Doctrine that requires buyers to examine property before making a purchase. Buyers who don't meet this burden can't recover for defects in the product This arises from the asymmetry of information between a purchaser and a seller. The seller tends to possess more information regarding the product than the buyer Exceptions to caveat emptor Fraud: If the seller sells through fraudulent means Deceit: If the seller intentionally misrepresents or conceals facts Negligent misrepresentation: If the seller provides false information due to negligence Goods sold by description: If the goods don't match the description Goods of merchantable quality: If the seller doesn't provide goods of merchantable quality Sale by sample: If the rest of the goods don't resemble the sample Seller's expertise: If the buyer relies on the seller's technical expertise and experience Latent defects: In real estate transactions, a vendor is liable for undisclosed latent defects that make a property dangerous or unfit for its intended use |
Doctrine of Caveat Venditor(sem-2) |
Caveat(Warning), Venditor(Seller) Latin phrase that means "let the Seller beware". Sellers are responsible for their products' quality and should know if they're not good enough. In this case, the seller is responsible for any faults in the product, not the buyer Cases 1936 Grant v Australiam Knitting Mills. A purchased 2 pants from mill, wore next day and got ill. Mill had negligibly dissovled irritating chemical in cloth. 1922 Rea Ltd v Mahcester Liners Ltd. Manchester(was Ship) who ordered coal for ship from Rea. Rea supplied generic coal which did not fuled Manchester. |
Doctrine of Frustration |
Allows a party to be released from a contract if unforeseen circumstances make performance impossible. Eg: A and B agrees to marry. Before date of marraige A goes mad. contract becomes void. Essentials: valid/existing contract between parties, Some part must remain to be performed. |
Doctrine of Holding Out (Section-28, Indian Partnership Act of 1932)(sem-2) |
A person can be held liable as a partner in a firm, even if he's not designated partner on papers,
if they represent themselves as a partner through words, actions, or silence A meets B and tells He's partner of firm C. B trusts A purchases goods of C and later gets loss, Now A is liable to pay losses. Essentials of Doctrine of Holding Out - Representation: A person voluntarily represents themselves as a partner of firm, by words/conduct/or writing - Knowledge of representation: 3rd party must be aware of the representation. |
Doctrine of Implied Authority(sem-2) |
An agent can act on behalf of a principal without explicit authorization How Scope of an agent is decided by actual authority: - Written or oral agreement between the agent and principal - Relevant business/profession(Eg: In Insurance, Agent is given high authority) |
Doctrine of Immposibility | law does not compel a man to do anything vain or impossible or to do something which he cannot possibly perform. |
Doctrine of Privity of Contract | A contract cannot impose obligations or confer rights on anyone who is not a party to the contract |
Doctrine of Privity of Restitution(Payment of damage/restoration) |
legal provision to restitute party for any mistaken court judgment or wrongful gains Case: 1928. Khan Gul vs Lakha Singh: |
Continuing guarantee | Simple guarantee | |
---|---|---|
What | Extends over series of transactions over a set time limit,A will pay series of amount if B cannot pay | Surety's liability ends when the debt is paid or the performance is done |
Revocation | Can be revoked by the surety at any time | cannot be revoked in any circumstances |
Liability(legally responsible) | Surety's liability is co-extensive with the principal debtor's | Surety's liability ends when the debt is paid or the performance is done |
Duration | Has a set time limit or duration, such as one month or one year | Does not end after a single promise or debt is repaid |
Co-ownership | Partnership | |
---|---|---|
What | multiple people jointly own a property | two or more people work together to run a business for profit |
Based on | Based on an agreement/inheritance/by law without a contract | always created by a contract |
Business motive | common enjoyment of property | profit |
Liability | co-owners' liability is limited to the value of their stock certificates. | partners are equally and personally liable for all business debts and obligations |
Registered company | Partnership | |
---|---|---|
Seperate Legal Entity | yes. can have own assets and property | no. partners are personally liable for the partnership's debts |
Capital requirements | 1 lakh to start | No min capital |
Taxes | Tax exempted | Must pay taxes on profits |
Joint Hindu Family(HUF) | Partnership | |
---|---|---|
Formation | HUF is formed by birth in the family. | Partnership is formed by a contract between partners |
Governance | HUF is governed by Hindu law | Governed by the Partnership Act of 1932 |
Liability | Head has unlimited liability and other members have limited liability | All partners have unlimited liability |
Membership | Membership is limited to male members | Women can be full partners |
Incoming | Outgoing | |
---|---|---|
What |
New partner who joins the firm by contract or is added by the firm A new partner can only be introduced to a firm with the consent of all existing partners |
Partner who leaves the firm, either by death, expulsion, or retirement S-33, Indian Partnership Act. A partner can also be removed from the firm if certain conditions are met |
Rights and liabilities |
- liable for the firm's debts and acts from the date they join - Not liable for anything that happened before |
- Right to compete: Continue a competing business - Right to share subsequent Profits: Share any profits that come after they leave until they are paid what they are owed |
Modes of Retirement | By consent, aggrement, notice, insolvency, death, explusion(Expell by majority of partners). |